On the topic of bad takes against Flatpak, my personal favorite is "Flatpak is bad because it works badly with my NVIDIA GPU's drivers"
Consider the following: NVIDIA GPU's (proprietary) drivers work badly on Linux
Under no circumstances should volunteers in the FOSS community ever be placed in a position that forces them to bend over large corporations, even if it hurts the user experience. Besides, the ones who are actually hurting users is the corporations by making it hard for everyone.
This is also true with Fedora's hostility towards proprietary drivers. This kind of hostility should be encouraged. As a community, we should collectively shame entities that push proprietary garbage as a dependency on Linux, so long it doesn't harm security.
vt.social/users/trafotin/statu…
Sergey Bugaev
in reply to TheEvilSkeleton 🇮🇳 🏳️⚧️ • • •TheEvilSkeleton 🇮🇳 🏳️⚧️
in reply to Sergey Bugaev • • •Hakan Bayındır
in reply to Sergey Bugaev • • •@bugaevc
I'll kindly disagree with you here. Considering both AMD and Intel can write drivers which doesn't infringe on any patents and doesn't expose any of their secret sauce (AMD Catalyst and AMDGPU are completely different codebases), NVIDIA is the only one who acts like this and creates a special firmware to cripple their cards so open drivers can't enable the whole GPU.
NVIDIA revised hardware to be able to lock them down further while AMD changed hardware to unlock it.
TheEvilSkeleton 🇮🇳 🏳️⚧️
in reply to Hakan Bayındır • • •