Buenos días desde la Administración Pública.

Persiguiendo con mi actuación la satisfacción de los intereses generales de los ciudadanos y y fundamentándola en consideraciones objetivas orientadas hacia la imparcialidad y el interés común, al margen de cualquier otro factor que exprese posiciones personales, familiares, corporativas, clientelares o cualesquiera otras que puedan colisionar con este principio.

Y vosotros, ¿qué tal?

Interesting post by Cloudflare on detecting #CGNAT as well as the performance and availability impacts to users behind it: blog.cloudflare.com/detecting-…

This re-enforces the importance for both:
1) content providers to dual-stack sites (so that #IPv6 end-users can bypass CGNAT)
2) the importance for networks to deploy IPv6 alongside CGNAT so that only a shrinking subset of traffic needs to go through CGNAT

Of particular concern is the concentration of CGNAT in the developing world, creating even more risk of a multi-tier Internet with an IPv6-centric modern internet but with other parts of the world being stuck in the past with IPv4 CGNAT.

This entry was edited (1 day ago)

curl.se, the domain itself, celebrates five years as home of #curl today.

I told the story back then:

daniel.haxx.se/blog/2020/11/04…

#curl

Abyste si udělali představu, jak jednoduchý je dodat vám na #VHSky projev prezidenta z 28. října:
28.10. večer
"Hele tyvole, ten projev je asi jako dobrej, nebylo by to dobrý nahodit i k nám?"
29.10. 5:43
Odesílám e-mail do kanceláře prezidenta republiky s žádostí o práva nahodit záznam i k nám
29.10. 11:40
Kancelář prezidenta reaguje s tím, že záznam prováděla #ČeskáTelevize a práva k distribuci také patří jí
29.10 11:48
Posílám téměř stejný e-mail do České televize s tím, že mě na ně odkázal #prezident, respektive jeho tým
29.10. 11:53
<Automatická odpověď - o Vašem e-mailu víme a určitě se mu budeme věnovat hned, jak dopijeme kafe nebo tak něco>
31.10. 8:14
Parafrázuji - "Jsme rádi, že nám píšete, ale píšete na blbý oddělení. Obraťte se na obchodní oddělení"
31.10. 8:48
Přeposílám téměř stejný e-mail na jiné oddělení v #ČT, kde zmiňuji, že mě na ně odkázal tým prezidenta a jiné oddělení televize.
3.11. 10:52
Píše mi produkční oddělení (ano, nikoliv obchodní :)) ČT, že záznam není licencovaný, je pouze nutné uvést zdroj a že mi ho dodají, když zaplatím 3 litry na technické náklady.
3.11. 11:00
Zasílám e-mail, zda chápu správně, že když si to z videa vyseknu sám a napíšu, že to je z ČT, tak ušetřim tři litry
3.11. 11:05
Produkční oddělení potvrzuje, že to je legálně správný postup pro toto video, ale ať si dám pozor, že u ostatních je většinou potřeba zaplatit licenci.
3.11. 20:09
Video visí! :party popper::party popper::party popper::party popper:

Nejtěžší je dostat se k někomu kompetentnímu - ve chvíli, kdy se mnou komunikoval produkční, tak už to šlo rychle a byli i celkem ochotní. Každopádně až se budete ptát, proč to zpoždění, tak tady je důvod :)

Dirty

Sensitive content

#1 #2

watching a video about private equity buying everything in pro audio (native instruments, etc)

i think over a long enough timescale (more than five years) the only tools that remain are FOSS ones.

it doesn't matter that you think they're janky compared to professional-grade ones (sometimes they are, sometimes they're actively better, though that's rare)

because you won't have your professional-grade ones for very long, anyways.

This entry was edited (1 day ago)

If you are not yet convinced that Fedora Flatpaks is a hostile 'alternative' to Flathub, here's a good one for you:

An indeterminate amount of their packages are, in fact, directly based on existing manifests from Flathub. Not by manually inspecting code themselves; rather, by running a script which goes through Flathub's APIs and parses the respective apps' manifest to generate manifests for Fedora Flatpaks: pagure.io/flatpak-module-tools…

All this, without crediting the original authors.

#Flatpak #Flathub #Fedora

in reply to Lukas

@lukas

> The comments over there (so far) are by people who don’t understand Fedora nor flatpaks, it seems.

discussion.fedoraproject.org/t…

This is often the kind of sentiment resonating around Fedora, in my experience. If you don't agree, you "don't understand" it. Never mind the fact that I used to contribute to Fedora in the past, where my earlier contributions were articles about Fedora Flatpaks!

- fedoramagazine.org/an-introduc…
- fedoramagazine.org/comparison-…

Sincerely, this comes from someone who was deeply interested in Fedora Flatpaks and wanted to push it in a non-hostile direction, but the developers have shown that they just want to turn it into a 'traditional package manager with extra steps'.

in reply to TheEvilSkeleton 🇮🇳 🏳️‍⚧️

You have my full support, if anyone at Fedora tries to tell you you don't get it, remind them that Bazzite and Bluefin and Aurora have had orders of magnitude more success than Fedora's offerings and depend on flatpak as the default install method. We go out of our way to remove every trace of Fedora Flatpak and our store even ignores the repo if installed by the end user or brought over from someone rebasing. To do anything else would be a disservice to our users.
This entry was edited (4 hours ago)

New Blog Post: Seth Jenkins broke kASLR by doing … nothing 😩

googleprojectzero.blogspot.com…

This entry was edited (2 days ago)

Hear me out.

We fork Mumble server. We change the chat to be IRC. We use Obsidian IRC (web irc clone of discord) as the client. IRCv3 SASL EXTERNAL will let us auth the user using the same key identity mumble uses. Convert the Obsidian web to Tauri for cross platform desktop app.

That's it. Self-hosted Discord, now just improve the UI and invite people to rewrite in Rust and add storage backends for the chat history and nobody needs Discord ever again.

github.com/ObsidianIRC/Obsidia…

This entry was edited (1 day ago)

Peter Vágner reshared this.

in reply to anna, a criticality incident at the gender accelerator

@anna the certificates would still exist, I don't know if that can easily be ripped out as Mumble is using TLS client auth essentially to identify you. But we could hide it better and streamline account backup / admin capability to help people recover accounts.
in reply to divVerent

I didn't exactly do it that way (I proved it over prop rather than bool).

What I did was incorporate the explicit LEM propositions like this:

Theorem deMorgan:
forall p q: Prop,
(~(p /\ q) /\ (p \/ ~p) /\ (q \/ ~q)) -> (~p \/ ~q).

Introduce p and q (universal intro). Then unfold the not, and get:
(p /\ q -> False) /\ (p \/ (p -> False)) /\ (q \/ (q -> False)) ->
(p -> False) \/ (q -> False)

Then intro the hypothesis, destruct the two ands and get:
H : p /\ q -> False
H0 : p \/ (p -> False)
H1 : q \/ (q -> False)
===
(p -> False) \/ (q -> False)

From there, destruct H0, which opens two subproofs by disjunction elimination, one with P and one with P -> false.

For case P, prove the right branch of the goal's disjunction, Q -> false.
Introduce Q (assume the hypothesis).
Then apply H, to the goal, which by now is False, and it becomes P /\ Q.
Split and prove each branch by assumption, since we have both P and Q.

For case P -> False, prove the left branch of the goal, by assumption, since p -> False proves P -> False.

Qed.

in reply to modulux

In fact I realised I don't need such a strong LEM assumption for both P and Q. The assumption for one is enough.

(~(p /\ q) /\ ((p / ~p) / (q / ~q))) -> (~p / ~q).

Works fine.

Just destruct the disjunction and use the same symmetric proof strategy for both:

In Coq script:

intros p q.
unfold not.
intros.
destruct H.
destruct H0.
destruct H0.
right.
intros.
apply H.
split; assumption.
left.
assumption.
destruct H0.
left.
intros.
apply H.
split; assumption.
right.
assumption.
Qed.

uspol - election

Sensitive content

November 2025 Security Bulletin Patches Already Included In Early Security Preview Releases By GrapheneOS


Both patches in the November 2025 Android Security Bulletin have been included since our September 2nd release. It's now known that our 2025090200 and later releases provided the 2025-11-05 Android security patch level early due to shipping extra patches.

source.android.com/docs/securi…

It's because these two patches were included in the full September 2025 bulletin patches we shipped but were made optional until November 2025.

Later in September, we started our security preview releases able to provide Android Security Bulletin patches around 2-3 months early.

Our security preview releases currently have the December 2025 and January 2026 patches.

December 2025 has a huge set of patches due to being a quarterly patch level. January 2026 will likely be empty.

We should have quarterly March 2026 patches to ship within a couple weeks.

Due to having early access to the patches which we can use for our security preview releases, we've been able to determine that a subset were pushed to AOSP and other projects prior to the official embargo ending which means we'll be including those in our regular releases soon.

Our security preview releases shipped all available December 2025 security patches in September 2025 and have continued adding the remaining patches. It should be frozen soon, but most of the patches have remained the same since September. Some were deferred to future bulletins.

The new security patch system being used by Android is confusing for users and bad for the security of anyone not using GrapheneOS with our security preview releases. We could have set the patch level string to 2025-11-01 in early September but in this case we didn't do that.

I was visiting Austin, Texas over the weekend. A totally accidental Facebook ad told me that Jacob Collier was in town with a solo show and that the tickets were available. I could not believe my ears. NOt only the tickets were available, but the show was an absolute top-notch!
I think he will be in Australia, India, China, in December, among other places. Catch him if you can! It's a real treat for anyone who loves harmonies and highly-skilful musicianship!

The Trump regime says it will pay SNAP benefits reduced by 50% to the 22 million households enrolled in the program.

Reminder that this reduction in food access is verbatim how Netanyahu has treated Palestinians in Gaza for decades.

This is why we warned that whatever is permitted to them "over there" will be done to us over here.

This injustice is coming from so called "Christians." Of course we all recall when Jesus said I'll only feed 5 out of 5000. /s

[Blog Post] Apple Releases iOS 26.1 and iPadOS 26.1 with accessibility enhancements, new language support for Live Translation, and more applevis.com/blog/apple-releas…

reshared this