On the topic of AI tools finding issues: we always thought they *could* do good. The right tool used by a skilled person is a recipe for awesome outcomes. An AI chat in the hands of someone who doesn't quite know what they ask for nor understand what the output says is not. Not to mention that the LLMs frequently just plainly lie.
A primary problem is the myths sold by "big AI" that make people believe they can do these things by themselves. That leads to slop avalanches.
Daniel Karling
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •RolandRides
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Positive Vibes!
Gistdaniel:// stenberg://
in reply to RolandRides • • •RolandRides
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to RolandRides • • •RolandRides
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to RolandRides • • •@RolandRides you're entitled to that opinion. I suspect you don't see the effects of their "snakeoil style marketing" the same way I do.
I suspect you by now realized I never said LLM cannot be used for coding.
RolandRides
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Reduce hallucinations - Claude Docs
docs.claude.combobschi
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Susan James
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •pookiesorcery
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •slograb
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Lizzie Rose 🏳️⚧️ 🥀
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •this is by far the most important lesson I have been trying to teach my engineers and product managers. I have had so much success using LLMs to do parts of my job, and so others try to emulate with far less luck. What they don't see is the process I've developed to only use the LLM for things I know it is good at, or the time I spend reviewing everything it produces to ensure that it is a level of quality that I am happy with. Definitely a time saver and lets me get more done, but not a tool that can run unsupervised.
I still can't fathom throwing it at an unfamiliar problem or codebase and blindly trusting the results, but unfortunately the AI marketing has convinced so many people that you can
Jörn Franke
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •AI-Generated “Workslop” Is Destroying Productivity
Harvard Business ReviewMrAptronym
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •四
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •I think the big issue is that was sold was: You hardly know what a computer is, but if you type “Hack the Gibson” in a prompt you are now a hacker.
Same with images, music, etc.
I don’t think that sci fi dream is realistic, at least not in this current version of things.
But a tool to search through code to find issues, that are better than the previous tools, that presents the issues to a knowledgeable person. That’s realistic and cuts down on reading all that code.
Because we’ve had tools for a very long time, and they could get better.