Friendica
daniel:// stenberg://
daniel:// stenberg://

daniel:// stenberg://

bagder@mastodon.social

daniel:// stenberg://

bagder@mastodon.social
I write curl. I don't know anything.
ActivityPub
2025-07-25 19:25:38 2025-07-23 14:36:02 2025-07-23 14:36:01 8292762

daniel:// stenberg://
daniel:// stenberg://
mastodon - Link to source

daniel:// stenberg://

1 month ago • •

daniel:// stenberg://

1 month ago • •


EU-STF for funding critical Open Source

daniel.haxx.se/blog/2025/07/23…


EU-STF for funding critical Open Source

A picture showing most modern digital products and services Current digital infrastructure is to a large degree built on layers and layers of Open Source.
daniel.haxx.se
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

Howard Chu @ Symas
mastodon - Link to source

Howard Chu @ Symas

in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 1 month ago • •
kinda wonder if something like Canada's old blank CD tax would be a decent funding model. Maybe a flat corporate tax to fund open source...
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to Howard Chu @ Symas

daniel:// stenberg://
mastodon - Link to source

daniel:// stenberg://

in reply to Howard Chu @ Symas • 1 month ago • •
@hyc if an EU-STF is created, it would in effect become something like that, right? At least taxes would fund open source.
@Howard Chu @ Symas
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

Howard Chu @ Symas
mastodon - Link to source

Howard Chu @ Symas

in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 1 month ago • •
if it's purely "EU funded" that implies to me that it's from a general fund that also includes personal/individual income tax, which I'd be opposed to. It should be funded by the corporations profiting from open source, not the general populace.
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to Howard Chu @ Symas

daniel:// stenberg://
mastodon - Link to source

daniel:// stenberg://

in reply to Howard Chu @ Symas • 1 month ago • •
@hyc if the software is "critical", it is used widely in society already so you ARE using it, so adding the tax on companies makes no difference in the end because they charge their users: us. We are the ones paying either way.
@Howard Chu @ Symas
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

Howard Chu @ Symas
mastodon - Link to source

Howard Chu @ Symas

in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 1 month ago • •
I suppose. But even if everyone uses it, not everyone is financially profiting from it. If you tax the companies, even if they pass the cost onto their customers, it's still more targeted than taxing everyone.
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

Josh Bressers
mastodon - Link to source

Josh Bressers

in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 1 month ago • •
But how would an elephant with a bird shaped iceberg float!?!?!?
A very badly drawn elephant with a bird on its back drawn in iceberger (the drawing is worse than you think it is)
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to Josh Bressers

daniel:// stenberg://
mastodon - Link to source

daniel:// stenberg://

in reply to Josh Bressers • 1 month ago • •
@joshbressers finally we know!
@Josh Bressers
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

Van_quixote
mastodon - Link to source

Van_quixote

in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 1 month ago • •
Oh great, so we get to pay for the mess caused by giant, non-European freeloading companies. Because clearly, taxpayers exist to subsidize corporate negligence. What’s next? Should we thank them too? 🥲 #Linux #KDE #OpenSource #FOSS #BigTech #Fairness
#linux #foss #opensource #KDE #bigtech #fairness
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
⇧