Here it is. Post 2 in my series on #Linux #accessibility. This time, I'm digitally screaming about the audio stack.
As always, feedback is encouraged and welcomed, and subscribe via rss or email to receive plane-text versions of what I write, the day after publishing at 10 am UTC
fireborn.mataroa.blog/blog/i-w…
#a11y #linuxAudio #linuxAccessibility
As always, feedback is encouraged and welcomed, and subscribe via rss or email to receive plane-text versions of what I write, the day after publishing at 10 am UTC
fireborn.mataroa.blog/blog/i-w…
#a11y #linuxAudio #linuxAccessibility
This entry was edited (4 days ago)
reshared this
Luca Ruggeri
in reply to aaron • • •aaron
in reply to Luca Ruggeri • • •Luca Ruggeri
in reply to aaron • • •aaron
in reply to Luca Ruggeri • • •Luca Ruggeri
in reply to aaron • • •aaron
in reply to Luca Ruggeri • • •Raise, manage and disburse money with full transparency.
opencollective.comLuca Ruggeri
in reply to aaron • • •Luca Ruggeri
in reply to aaron • • •aaron
in reply to Luca Ruggeri • • •Luca Ruggeri
in reply to aaron • • •aaron
in reply to Luca Ruggeri • • •Luca Ruggeri
in reply to aaron • • •aaron
in reply to Luca Ruggeri • • •Luca Ruggeri
in reply to aaron • • •Raptor
in reply to Luca Ruggeri • • •aaron
in reply to Raptor • • •I also know that they *can* be started in system mode from boot, but it never comes configured that way, and unless you know how to do it, or find a script to do it for you, it won't be. That was my point. I can configure that, because I know about the feature, and how ot set it up. A new linux user might have no idea. I talked about that a bit more in post 1.
Raptor
in reply to aaron • • •aaron
in reply to Raptor • • •Raptor
in reply to aaron • • •Danielle Foré
in reply to Luca Ruggeri • • •aaron
in reply to Danielle Foré • • •Danielle Foré
in reply to aaron • • •Peter Vágner likes this.
Peter Vágner reshared this.
aaron
in reply to Danielle Foré • • •aaron
in reply to aaron • • •Danielle Foré
in reply to aaron • • •I’m really looking forward to hearing how we can continue to improve our experience for blind folks 🩷
GitHub Sponsors or LiberaPay are the best ways. Thank you so much!
github.com/sponsors/elementary
liberapay.com/elementary/
Sponsor @elementary on GitHub Sponsors
GitHubBeardy Star Stuff
in reply to Luca Ruggeri • • •@lcruggeri Seems like it would be good to encourage and normalize a trend towards sharing about what FOSS we've donated to most recently. Make it a part of FOSS social culture. If we're openly sharing every time we donate it might encourage or remind others.
My most recent donations were to the Linux Mint folks, Thunderbird, Wikipedia. My donations are always small due to my budget but repeated throughout the year as often as I'm able.
#Linux #FOSS
aaron
in reply to Beardy Star Stuff • • •Luca Ruggeri
in reply to aaron • • •aaron
in reply to Luca Ruggeri • • •Luca Ruggeri
in reply to aaron • • •Daniel Gibson
in reply to Luca Ruggeri • • •How is that supposed to work?
The majority of users don't need accessibility features.
Projects already prioritize features themselves, and apparently accessibility is low on the list for most of them.
So if donations are supposed to make a difference, they need to be tied to accessibility - otherwise 99% of your donation will be used for more widely used features
aaron
in reply to Daniel Gibson • • •Daniel Gibson
in reply to aaron • • •True, that could happen - but I fear for many projects just getting money without any communication of intend will be used for the most popular features (that still are considered improvable).
Most projects will have several features that they'd love to improve if they had the resources, so prioritizing is hard
aaron
in reply to Daniel Gibson • • •Daniel Gibson
in reply to aaron • • •I wonder if a different model of paying someone to work on accessibility who then works on different projects as needed would be better - but OTOH that might not work that well given how hard it is to contribute code to some bigger projects, especially as an outsider...
aaron
in reply to Daniel Gibson • • •Serge from Babka
in reply to aaron • • •Thanks for this, since I haven't really understood Linux audio since ALSA other than being vaguely aware of Pulse.
I'm thinking about how situations like this happen in "Linux" vs how things in Windows or other (newer) systems feel like they're better, even though just like your article points out, many of the older APIs for sound are still there on Windows as well!
I think I've identified three things, but I'd love your thoughts.
1. There's no centralized body dictating changes
We have FreeDesktop, but there's no one officially saying "This is now deprecated. Stop using it"
2. Linux itself inherited the idea of being compatible with older Unixes and an OS legacy going back to the 70s.
3. Developers aren't given a lot of guidance when knowing what to implement. At best they are just using SDKs from the desktop environment.
With that, how do you see a way forward to improve the situation?
aaron
in reply to Serge from Babka • • •Serge from Babka
in reply to aaron • • •I think my questions are applicable for any aspect of Linux, really.
Best practices are encoded through APIs and SDKs, rather than through a central body, and that makes it challenging for developers.
aaron
in reply to Serge from Babka • • •Josh Simmons
in reply to Serge from Babka • • •aaron
in reply to Josh Simmons • • •Josh Simmons
in reply to aaron • • •aaron
in reply to Josh Simmons • • •Kirill
in reply to aaron • • •aaron
in reply to Kirill • • •Aren
in reply to aaron • • •Huh, somehow this has me feeling optimistic... I guess it sounds like there's a lot of low-hanging fruit. You mentioned not having a audio mixer with good accessibility, which sounds like could be improved with a couple weekends of getting acquainted with the accessibility stack (or I haven't fully comprehended how bad it is yet). I've been meaning to learn how the screen readers and such work, and that seems like a good jumping-off point.
1/3
Daniel Gibson
in reply to aaron • • •aaron
in reply to Daniel Gibson • • •Daniel Gibson
in reply to aaron • • •aaron
in reply to Daniel Gibson • • •