Skip to main content


Question! Why should local governments use taxpayers’ money to buy proprietary, closed software from a single vendor? And what happens to citizens' data? A solution is to move to free and open source software like #Linux and #LibreOffice – which is exactly what Schleswig-Holstein is doing: blog.documentfoundation.org/bl… #foss #OpenSource #privacy

reshared this

in reply to LibreOffice

Hadn't this been tried twice in Munich?
LiMux
This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to Zeki Çatav 🤔 ☕ 🕯️🎶

@catavz A long, long time ago – a lot has changed since then. And many would argue that it didn't succeed for political reasons, rather than technical: itsfoss.com/munich-linux-failu…
in reply to LibreOffice

@catavz This is the sole reason people don't use more open-source software, people are hesitant to adopt new technologies (which makes sense if you've built your skill-set on those technologies but I ultimately believe that's flawed thinking) and the lack of wide-spread adoption essentially isolates those who do make that change.
in reply to LibreOffice

To #Linux or to #GNU? Linux is a kernel, not an operating system. There are not many other OSes with a Linux kernel. GNU, Android and Musl distributions are the most common if not the only ones. The rest are derivations of them. For example µClibc is a GNU implementation.
This entry was edited (7 months ago)
in reply to LibreOffice

That is great to hear! Please brace for the political backlash and constant and continuous lobbying of proprietary software vendors.

That's what in the end brought down earlier attempts in e.g. Munich (#LiMux) or the German Federal Foreign Office.

in reply to LibreOffice

this will bode well for the future, when their IT departments are experienced in the software and can contribute code to it!
in reply to LibreOffice

excited every time we hear about this kind of news. Also, yeah tax funded infrastructure should be spent for free libre open source software.
in reply to LibreOffice

Not that I would defend M$, but the cost of the operating system and the software is a fraction of the cost of the machines it runs and and the personnel that use it.

Retraining thousands of employees to use Open source products might be more expensive than the cost of the operating system & software.

Then there's the problem that almost always there will be essential software that only runs on MS desktops.

And then there's hardware compatibility issues.

in reply to LibreOffice

NIce to read it !

Comparing Microsoft Word vs. LibreOffice Writer and why you should use LibreOffice :
youtube.com/watch?v=2yTqPOuVNM…

The end of Windows 10 support could turn 240 million PCs into e-waste :
canalys.com/insights/end-of-wi…

and so on !

in reply to LibreOffice

Note2Self: time to give #LibreOffice another try. I did try it 3x in the past but it did not work for me in terms of features (e.g. collaboration), usability, UX, interoperability.
in reply to LibreOffice

@opensuse Congrats to all involved. (But I also remember, what happened to #LiMux and #WollMux in #Munich. 😞 I wish for all, that it won't repeat.)
in reply to LibreOffice

Munich tried this switch to LibreOffice and returned because of some 'sweet' MS deal a few years later. However, things have changed. I am a LibreOffice user (through Star Office/Open Office) since 1999.
in reply to LibreOffice

I appreciate the project and taking on MS but it does feel like stepping back in time 15 years when using Libre Office, especially with the lack of real time collaboration functions. There's a nice Arstechnica article about a demo from... 2012 that showcases this.
in reply to Hein

@heind Hi! You can already get these features in LibreOffice by sourcing it from the wider ecosystem: libreoffice.org/download/libre… – But we understand that some people want it in the app directly from The Document Foundation. We (TDF) have very limited resources and focus on the desktop app, but we have some ideas for collaborative features coming up...
@Hein
in reply to LibreOffice

"Why" would be if they've done the sums and decided it's cheaper (or, less simply, better value for money) for the taxpayer. Different authorities will do the sums different ways at different times and get different answers.