I hear you loud and clear Nobel Prize, you don't want to be left off of the AI hype train.
Next will be a Nobel peace prize for "AI safety."
Don't they supposedly wait for decades before seeing the impact, like new drugs that were created or something like that, before awarding Nobel Prizes?


zephred
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to zephred • • •Oliver Schönrock
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Nice
replaced by strlcpy?
daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •as I have mentioned elsewhere I have worked fiercely on reducing memory calls and memory copies in curl code over the last few years, and I have come to realize that strncpy is often a marker for questionable code decisions, so I have worked on removing those questionable code paths.
As I have reduced the amount already before, the remaining few uses were not hard to just fix with better conditions and improved logic
daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •synlogic
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •yeah I have a fondness for K&R C but looking back many of its standard lib functions were a Bad Idea that at best only made sense for some brief "Garden of Eden" period in the world's software ecosystem
before any user could be a determined (and well-resourced) adversary or a mind bogglingly careless idiot. haha
Andreas Schneider
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •while I understand that C was always ever meant as a relatively light abstraction, I still don't understand why native string handling was never incorporated. Dealing with strings is relevant in _so_ many use cases, that not having a sane and safe abstraction for it is just asking for trouble.
I think that's one of the first things Borland improved on in their derivates of Pascal.