Buenas tardes, tres cosas:

La primera, que he escrito una novela.
La segunda, que me la publican.
La tercera, que no tengo ni la más remota idea de cómo he conseguido ni la primera ni la segunda cosa.

«illo» es un drama familiar que se desarrolla por las calles de Triana y Sevilla y en el que hay tensión, acción, pasados complicados, lluvia y hasta un partido del Betis. Lo publica Editorial Dieciséis y estará disponible en su web y en vuestra librería de barrio a partir del 17 de octubre.

1: AI is hallucinating events, historical figures, entire concepts on Wikipedia

2: a task force of Wikipedia editors is detecting and deleting this stuff

404media.co/the-editors-protec…

Reading WITHOUT Sight: Challenging the Ableist Assumptions of Non-Visual Literacy

In today’s world, where accessibility is supposedly ever-expanding, comments on how blind people read – or rather, whether we “really” read – reveal a significant amount of latent ableism. When someone remarks, “You’re not really reading because you have to listen to it,” they are unwittingly touching on deep-seated biases that marginalize blind people and our experience. For me, as a blind person, these comments feel aggressive, like a slur that undermines not only my intellect but my very existence within a literate society. The underlying suggestion that my method of consuming literature is somehow less legitimate than traditional reading reflects a lack of understanding and a failure to appreciate the richness of alternative literacy.

At its core, this statement implies that visual reading is the only valid form of reading – an attitude deeply rooted in ableist assumptions. Just as the sighted world learns and adapts to new ways of accessing information, blind people, too, use technology to bridge gaps that were once insurmountable. By suggesting that listening to an audiobook or using a screen reader is inferior to reading with one’s eyes, the speaker perpetuates a narrow view of literacy that excludes anyone who does not fit their narrow definition of a reader.

The Emotional Impact of Dismissive Comments

Hearing such remarks can be hurtful. When someone tells me I’m not “really reading,” they trivialize the effort, love, and passion I pour into every book. Reading, in any form, is more than just a mechanical process; it’s an engagement with ideas, narratives, and emotions. Denying my capacity to “really” read is akin to erasing my agency in choosing to explore literature. It dismisses my experience and can feel like a personal attack, minimizing my intelligence and curiosity.

Moreover, these comments strip away the nuances of my identity and life experience as a blind person. They ignore the reality that many of us navigate systems not designed with us in mind, yet we adapt with resilience and creativity. Listening to a book, for me, is as much an engagement with its content as sighted reading is for others. This medium allows me to dive into narratives, to imagine worlds, and to connect with characters just as vividly as if I were reading visually. Such a remark does not just invalidate my experience, but it also points to a societal failure to recognize and celebrate the diverse ways people interact with literature.

Understanding the Roots of Ableism

Ableism, at its core, stems from a belief that certain abilities, like sight, are inherently superior. This mindset manifests in the way sighted people sometimes view adaptations like screen readers or braille as substitutes, rather than as equally valid methods of accessing information. This thought pattern diminishes the lived experiences of blind individuals and subtly implies that we’re only half-participating in the world of literature. The comment reflects an ideology that upholds one mode of experiencing the world as ideal, while relegating others to second-class status.

Furthermore, literacy is a concept that should not be defined by sensory modality. Whether through braille, audio, or screen readers, blind readers engage in the same cognitive processes of understanding and analying text. These methods are not merely compensatory but rather alternate pathways that lead to the same destination.

Responding Constructively

Addressing this kind of ableism requires a blend of assertiveness and education. In responding to these comments, I could say something like, “When you suggest that I’m not really reading, it feels as if you’re diminishing my engagement with the text. For me, listening to a book offers the same intellectual and emotional journey as sighted reading does for you. It’s not about the method; it’s about the experience of connecting with the material. I’d appreciate it if we could acknowledge that there are many valid ways to be a reader.”

By framing the response in this way, I affirm my own experience while gently inviting the person to reconsider their assumptions. Another approach could be to highlight the diversity of literacy methods available today: “There’s a wide range of ways people can read now, whether through audio, braille, or text-to-speech technology. These methods open up the world of literature to more people and should be celebrated rather than diminished.”

My hope is that, in responding to these comments, I can foster a moment of reflection for others. Reading is about engaging with ideas and stories, not about the medium through which we access them. Ableist remarks about non-visual reading, though sometimes spoken thoughtlessly, present an opportunity to open minds and broaden perspectives. By sharing my experience, I contribute to a more inclusive understanding of literacy and help to dismantle the harmful stereotypes that still persist.

Conclusion

Reading is not an act confined to the eyes; it is an intellectual and emotional endeavour that transcends sensory modality. For many blind people, it is the ultimate expression of our love for stories, our curiosity, and our intellect. When someone diminishes my experience as “not really reading,” they underscore a fundamental misunderstanding of what it means to be a reader. As we continue to expand our understanding of accessibility, it is crucial to challenge and reframe such biases. Only by doing so can we begin to recognize and respect the many ways in which people interact with the written word, enriching our collective experience of literature in all its forms.

#Ableism #Accessibility #Audible #Blind #Braille #Disability #Equality #Inclusion #Kindle

Hungary keeps pushing for Chat Control. Here’s why they must be stopped:

👉 tuta.com/blog/opposition-again…

#chatcontrol #Fight4privacy #encryption #security

Sensitive content Click to open/close

No more need to accept egregious and one-sided user agreements!

puri.sm/posts/true-choice-for-…

#Librem5 #PureOS #Purism

Upon powerup, the CPU begins to execute code.

This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

Sensitive content Click to open/close

na Twittri má chcú... boti 🙄

Today at XDC 2024, my colleague @1ace from the Core team is going to co-host with Martin Roukala a demo on adding test machines to a CI-Tron instance: indico.freedesktop.org/event/6…

Live stream at: youtube.com/@XOrgFoundation/st…

Make sure to attend!

#xdc2024 #igalia

tired: tsunami

wired: sea plus plus

El subidón que me da cuando veo el título del correo del "BOE nuestro de cada día" que manda @civio y sale "El gobierno nacionaliza..."

Después ya veo que nacionaliza a otro deportista y se me pasa

EDIT: Aunque se baje el subidón, "El BOE nuestro..." siempre es interesante.

TIL `curl --show-error`. How many times have I wanted this 😞

`--show-error` is great, it will output any error on standard error, which is a crucial as it allows you to write code like:

```
version=$(curl --silent --show-error exampe.com/some.json | jq '.info.version')
```
If it succeeds, `jq` gets its input, but just as importantly, when it fails, the output isn't written into the `version` variable.

As always, read the *fine* manual at: curl.se/docs/manpage.html#-S

Cc: @bagder

My daughter’s friend just called me uncle, in English. I don’t run a shop!! 😂😂

– it’s an SEA thing, kids call all adults, including strangers, uncles or aunties. In Indonesia many of us use the Dutch loan words, oom and tante, and very rarely use the English words. Specifically in Malaysia and Singapore, non family aunties and uncles are more often people who run shops, food court stalls, or restaurants.

#TootSEA

Oh well. My current #ttrpg campaign I might have crashed, but at least this means I can fantasize about new campaigns I want to run.

One recurring problem of running campaigns at my age (late 40s) is that it is hard to find a group where everyone can consistently show up for every session - we all tend to have different obligations.

So ideally you want to have a campaign framework where each player character has some excuse for being absent for any given adventure - and yet there should be some justification for why they can jump back in during the next session.

This pretty much rules "epic quests" with lots of travel out. In the past, I've ran campaigns where the PCs have a specific home base and explored their surrounding area. But I am curious how you handled the problem.