Has anyone noticed that Zoom for Windows uses text fields which are technically inaccessible? They work around this by giving screen reader alerts whenever I use the arrow keys, select text, or delete characters.
Naturally, they don't just pass through the punctuation symbol to the screen reader, because they can't predict which punctuation will get spoken by the screen reader otherwise. So the names of symbols probably won't match the ones in a screen reader. It seems to be based partially on the JAWS symbol dictionary.
On a Braille display, the control is borderline unusable, because there's no cursor representation and any navigation or deletion will replace the entire text field with the announcement. If you type the word "potatos" and then discover there is only one potato, pressing the backspace will replace everything on your Braille display with a line that says "s deleted".
And to top things off, the announcer seems to completely ignore emoji characters and they don't seem to show up in the weird limited object navigation either, so there's no way to confirm you've typed them.
I wonder what kind of absurd design choice or company culture problem led to this need to completely reinvent the wheel for a text field of all things. I know QT had cursor tracking issues in text fields, but I thought that was fixed long ago.

Found Firefox 8.0.dmg on an old machine. It was 30.9 MB.

c'mon internet... you can do better

cíti a cíti
a v diaľke sa vidí
vidí a vidí
kopulou vpred

Byla jsem na filmu Franz od polské režisérky Anežky Hollandové. Dobře okolnosti Kafkova života v Praze ilustruje. Tmavá Praha. Pražák. Zakladatel absurdního díla.

I used one of them fancy GitHub scripts, and nuked Windows Defender off my system. Why you ask? Because it was always doing its background scans. Always. Always using CPU when I don't want it to. Nope. Not dealing with this bullshit from Microsoft at all. It's gone. Off my system you go. I tried Eset (their online scanner) but it was not super accessible, so still on the lookout for an AV that lets me manually do the scan and control it, doesn't have a high flagging rate for developer .exe files and things like Accessible_output2 in TWBlu and Tweesecake (yes, stupid Eset flagged these too, argh!) - I'm just done. I'm fed up with Windows AV software. They're all false positive land these days. This is why Linux is better in every way.