someone created a Godot plugin to open Unity packages and prefabs. this is game changing, just imagine reusing your unity assets to port a game to Godot from Unity. reddit.com/r/godot/comments/13…
Por lo demás, recursos de los productores de aceite de oliva contra el registro de contratos alimentarios, y de un ayuntamiento rebotado por la ubicación de la Agencia Espacial Española.
como toque de color, un conde renuncia a su título.
Continued: it's striking that the authors didn't even use conventional machine learning procedures to develop their classifier.
Rather, they chose features that made sense to them as indicators.
These were not even indicators of fake papers, but rather indicators of non-response to a survey —which of course is a very different thing than authorship of a fake paper.
"Note that the tallying rule [private email, no international collaborators] identifies likely fakes, but it cannot determine with certainty whether a given publication is actually (legally) a fake. Nevertheless, it is a reliable tool to red-flag scientific reports for further analysis and is a rational basis to estimate the upper value of fake publishing in biomedicine."
RELIABLE TOOL?
RATIONAL BASIS?
How could anyone write this stuff and post it in good faith?
"It is important to keep in mind that our indicators provide a red flag, not legal proof, that a given manuscript or publication might be fake. However, it is the authors' burden of proof to demonstrate that their science can be trusted."
BULLSHIT.
It is absolutely not the authors' burden of proof to demonstrate that their science can be trusted when the criteria used to question their work are (1) their email address and (2) the lack of international collaborators.
And then there's the survey they used to "validate" their hopeless instrument.
How would you respond if you received this from some random account?
As a misinformation researcher, I get all sorts of politically motivated harassment that looks a lot like this. Last thing I'm going to do is give them contacty information they could look up themselves for my university president, dean, HR people, etc.
To presume that not answering implies guilt is outrageous.
Finally, I want to stress that it is no defense whatsoever to say that the algorithm could be used simply as a preliminary screen to red-flag papers for additional scrutiny.
If one is going to propose machine-learning classifier to make instrumental decisions that affect careers and reputations, one must carefully and thoroughly consider issues of fairness and risks algorithmic harm that might arise.
The authors of this preprint don't even mention such issues.
Not only does the Science story fail to call them on this; its author falls into the one of the oldest and most pernicious traps around algorithmic bias.
The author contrasts the use of "automated methods" with reliance on "human prejudice", entirely overlooking the fact that the automated methods proposed here are nothing but the explicit and fully-descirbed instantiation of human prejudice.
UPDATE: The paper is on pubpeer, with a response from lead author Sabel.
I find it to be a completely unsatisfactory effort at misdirection, but decide for yourself.
The irony of this guy writing a preprint that spectacularly overestimates the frequency of fake papers using ridiculous methods, getting Science and NPR and a host of right-wing news organizations to pick it up, and then saying "The loss of trust in science is the key issue we should worry about."
Je to jedna z mála navigací, podporující původně letecké pásmo L5/E5. Tedy má vyšší přesnost v členitém terénu. "GPS (L1+L5) + GLONASS (L1) + Galileo (E1+E5a) + QZSS (L1+L5) + NavIC (L1)"
V ceně mapa Topo Czech Pro. Display chráněn fólii, tělo už nějaké škrábance má. Však má vojenskou odolnost a je určené do hor.
@Marco SocialHub admins are looking for people to join their Wellbeing team. People who can mediate conflict in a calm and reasonable way, and tell the difference between temporary grumpiness and patterns of trolling.
Can you think of anyone else who might be a good candidate? They're looking to diversify the team a bit. So particularly keen to welcome people who aren't straight, white, and cis.
@eprodrom asked a question on the swicg (Social Web Incubator Community Group) mailing list about why people were asking questions about AP/AS2 on SocialHub instead of there. @melvincarvalho posted a response that captures my situation well.
Thanks, and I appreciate the team wanting to diversify the moderation team. However, since I no longer work, for health reasons, and that work involved quite some stress with W3C procedures as well, I do not think me joining this social hub thingie would be a good idea. Not only would it probably not do my mental health any good, but it would also mean I could get unreliable, which would be unfair to the team. So I must decline.
Update --aws-sigv4 command line option example to include explicit us in region identifier aws:amz:east-2:es -> aws:amz:us-east-2:es
List of supported regions:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/l...
Calibre-Web is a great open source web #ebook library that can be used by the whole family. I wrote a blog post about how to install it, set it up and use it (in Czech, but DeepL translates it well). And thank you, @archos, for the tip. 😉 blog.eischmann.cz/2023/05/15/c…
OK when I started listening to it I didn't think it was going to be very funny but damn I was wrong. That is golden. Although how did this lady not notice the high hard one? And what's the show they said he did before the game? I couldn't understand it, something is tight?
@x0 There’s a lot more in that archive, including much younger versions of some people who are still here, people who thought they were sending private messages which actually weren’t as private as they thought and other weirdness.
@x0 It was Christopher Toth’s thing that let you upload and play audio in Qwitter, and old Twitter client of his. Way, waay before my time. It used a predictable ID scheme, so somebody scraped it and posted the whole thing on archive.org. It’s in the warc format (so basically raw HTTP responses), which is kinda unwieldy to work with, but I wrote some Python scripts that do the magic github.com/mikolysz/qadl
@x0 there so so so much shit in there. Music, private, that weren't so private dm's, I"m even in there if you know the posts to look for, and what files were me, but I"m certainly on there.
@x0 was around from october 2010, to I think, april or may of 2012. in those 20 years some insane number of gb were generated. People would upload show archives, for people, there's a rather large collection of a mexican or some kind of hispanic novela.
@cordova5029 @x0 There was also no validation, so people would make backups, compress them with 7zip, add strong encryption, change the extension to .mp3 and post them there.
@cordova5029 Oh I noticed SNDUp had a validation system which broke with particular kinds of MP3 files depending I think on the way the tags were stored, I had to talk to Josh about fixing that one.
@cordova5029 @x0 LOL I didn't know about this. I did post a MIDI file to it once. The funny thing is, I don't remember if Qwitter could actually play it properly.
@x0 I can host it if needed, I have the space and such. Just don't know if we want a raw index or what w want ... but I can totally throw that up there.
@x0 Looking at this in a moment of peripheral, fleeting interest. Is there a quicker and more intuitive way of grabbing all 7 parts from Archive.org? I tried downloading a few things but was met with an error about the files being too large to compress.
@x0 I've been playing with this, pretty neat! 2 questions. How big would this be if you asked it to fetch the entire list... and how much server strain on archive.org would that be? Wondering if it would be worth my while making a local copy of all this crazyness.
@x0 Yeah, figured archive.org would have the tolerance for a mass download of a puny 289gb, lol. It just feels a bit rude though. This one agent keeps coming back for more... and more... and ...
@x0 So. After going through some of the archive via these tools, I've come up with an interesting observation. It seems that at some point, the link scheme was changed so that instead of just straight numbers in base 10, numbers were now in base 36. However, it seems as a result, older posts were duplicated so that older base-10 links still worked. For example. 50 - Good_VS._Bad_Voice (1E) is later duplicated as 180 - Good_VS._Bad_Voice (50). That is, post 50 also shows up as post 180, where it equates to 50 in base 36. Weird! So if you noticed a lot of dups, I think that's why.
@arfy @x0 You’re absolutely right of course, and I noticed that same effect. The problem is in the underlying archive, which the tools I wrote merely extract. It could (and probably should) be worked around, but I’d need to learn more about how the ID scheme works exactly.
@arfy @x0 The ID scheme works as follows. It started out as just an increasing number. Then after a while it transitioned to a base36 ID, using the digits 0-9 and the letters a-z, might be upper case. I think it was base 36 and not base 62, though it could be base 62, in which case, letters of both lower and upper case were used. Any newer style ID that consists of just digits, and thus could conflict with an older file identified under the old scheme, had an underscore at the beginning.
"Empathy Models and Software Engineering" neverworkintheory.org/2023/05/… As generative AI takes over the routine aspects of writing code, the ability to understand people's viewpoints and needs—in short, the ability to empathize—is going to become the key skill for software engineers.
My home university is ditching physical diplomas for digital ones. I sort of see the upsides from the sustainability and e-authentication POV, but the printed diploma with all the twirls, embossing and ornaments is so cool. Sometimes having a physical symbol of your achievement is important. They suggest showing your diploma to relatives "from a laptop screen" or printing it on normal printer paper.....
Won’t this be an issue in other countries (particularly when dealing with governments / immigration?) I wouldn’t be surprised if they weren’t very happy with not being able to see the original.
@miki Most definitely. Even photocopies of the original can cause some hassle outside Finland, so a purely digital one will highly likely be a proper disadvantage when applying for a position somewhere.
The hp printer I bought disabled itself after my firewall blocked its spyware/telemetry. (The box said I needed an 'internet connection' not a 'raw, unfiltered connection'. And any computer worked/works on said connection.)
I took it back to the retailer. They unhappily refunded my money.
El presidente del Gobierno y líder del PSOE, Pedro Sánchez, ha anunciado este lunes dos medidas que se van a poner en marcha esta semana, una para que los...
El tema de los enfermos de cáncer es porque al tener en su historial que han tenido cáncer, tienen problemas para acceder a hipotecas, para hacer el trámite del seguro de vida que suelen exigir.
El tema de los 5 años hasta que no lo vea en el BOE lo trataré con cautela, pero parece ser que los discapacitados de más del 45% podrán jubilares a los 52 años si tienen 5 años cotizados.
tened en cuenta que hablamos como ciegos que tenemos muchas más posibilidades de trabajo, sea este mejor o peor, la mayoría de los discapacitados tienen suerte si logran trabajar 5 años a lo largo de su vida.
El corte para los 52 años estaba en el 66 % de discapacidad. Creo que entre el 33 y el 66 estaba en 58. Ahora el tramo baja un poco y a algunos les puede beneficiar.
oye, y si te jubilas puedes seguir trabajando? Ya sé que por sentido común no, pero pregunto porque ya se ve de todo. A mí me quedaría una mierda de pensión, pero podría complementarse con una mierda de sueldo y salir algo decente.
I guess I shouldn't play a game because it was written in Visual Basic 6, eh? Ridiculous idea. Also the author doesn't even really offer any other ideas, just to stop using the language.
¹ already at F-Droid, but added at authors request to keep up with the apps release pace. Install from F-Droid first, update where it arrives first (reproducible build)
This is a repository of apps to be used with F-Droid. Applications in this repository are official binaries built by the original application developers, taken from their resp. repositories (mostly Github).
Get hype: I'm finally doing an actual series! There will be an Ep 2! I promise this time! Computers!Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cathoderay...
those sound like good changes. I hope you'll consider refreshing the UI as well - I've recently checked out ProtonMail and despite having used Tutanota as my main inbox for the past 5 years or so (and having been a paid user for the past ~3 of those), I'm very tempted to migrate to Proton just for its mobile app experience.
Tried the dark mode in #LibreOffice 7.5 already? Here's what it looks like! (It should be enabled automatically depending on your system theme, but you can also toggle it on/off via Tools > Options > View...) Thanks to @CzuloOliver for the screenshot 😊
V západních městech se opravdu jezdí na kole a se sportem to nemá co dočinění. Kola se používají levná, aby je nikdo nekradl a klidně je lidi nechávají na vlakových stanicích S-Bahn a vlastně všude.
To je celý super 🙂
Jenže protože jsou kola levná, tak se občas nevyplatí se už pro něj vracet. Nikdo ho nechce, neukradne... A tak zůstane někde prostě opřené nafurt. Takže jednou za čas se sešrotují. Tolik k ekologii a plýtvání zdroji.
@Archos :distros_arch: :matrix: @Michal 🇨🇿 Jako jo, když se to takhle vyfotí, je to hrozný, ale představte si, že místo každých dvou bicyklů tam někdo postaví auto ... :D
Yes I think so. However for autocompletes, the WAI-ARIA authoring practices also have some good examples. The "dangers" involving menu and menu item roles, as well as screen reader behaviors, are still valid and haven't changed. See also: marcozehe.de/wai-aria-menus-us… which is also still valid. And don't expect much change in that regard anytime soon, either. So yes, listbox and option it is.
We now have a presence on the social media platform Mastodon. This enables us to increase the ways we connect with you to share training content and news. Mastodon is a social network where users c…
We've reached a new peak for #adware intrusiveness.
More and more businesses that rely on ads and data collection for their revenue are struggling to prove the sustainability and profitability of their model. As a result, they're becoming more and more aggressive in ads and data collection. With the discreteness of their data collection programs gone long ago, their new goal is to make a world full of adware and spyware the new normal.
Google is now showing ads in the middle of your emails, and YouTube is disabling streaming unless you disable your ad-blocker.
But it's hard to think of an idea more intrusive than PlutoTV's new marketing stunt. They're giving away 500k smart 4k TVs for free, with an embedded Chromecast included.
The catch? Their 55-inch TVs will have a secondary 9-inch display physically soldered on top that you can't turn off and that displays ads 24/7.
Anyone else feels some echoes of 1984 at the idea of a display in your home that you can't turn off and whose content you can't control?
The moment I was reading the sentence about a secondary display that you can't turn off 1984 popped in. Yes, definitely. I could not work for a company who does this.
- Fixed crash when viewing a thread - Fixed crash processing Mastodon filters - Links in bios of follow/follow request notifications are clickable - Android notification for a Mastodon notification should only be shown once - Android notifications are grouped by Mastodon notification type (follow, mention, boost, etc) - Potential for missing notifications has been removed
The notification changes are worth a quick explainer.
Previously, all your Mastodon notifications would appear as a single group of Android notifications with a "summary" notification that grouped them all.
We've just squashed some bugs caused by having a single summary notification, so now you'll see multiple summary notifications. One summary for all your "mention" notifications, one for all your "followed you" notifications, one for all your "boosted your post" notifications, and so on.
You can still turn different types of notification off (Account preferences > Notifications) on a group by group basis.
That's fixed one problem that may have led to reports of missing (Android) notifications.
Android applies some other limits to notifications that can also lead to missing notifications.
Any Android app can't have more 50 active notifications. So if you get more than 50 Mastodon notifications at once Tusky will hide some of them, oldest first.
And if an app tries to post too many notifications at once Android might mute or drop some of those notifications. Before, Tusky would send notifications as quickly as possible. So Android might have dropped them and you'd never see them. Now, Tusky sends them approximately once per second.
When we say missing notifications this is just the Android notifications. The notifications on your "Notifications" tab will not be missing -- they always appear.
Finally, Mastodon apps can synchronise the ID of the "most recently fetched" notification with your Mastodon server, so you don't see the same notification in two places at once.
So if you have your Mastodon home page and Tusky open at the same time it's quite possible that a notification will be processed by your Mastodon home page before Tusky gets it, and Tusky will not create an Android notification. Or vice-versa, you get a notification on your phone but not on your home page.
Something weird is going on with notification marker fetching, resulting in users seeing duplicate notifications. I see this on some accounts, but not others. Symptoms on a working account (nikclay...
Hi. Feature request: Could we please possibly have Sync timeline, so that Tusky picks up your position from other apps? I see a couple of other apps do this, and I wondered if we could please have it as a setting? Pretty please? :)
Something I noticed (hope it's ok to mention it here): zooming a very narrow image is difficult. The zoom gesture only works on the image, not the background, and when the image is *very* narrow it's difficult to hit. Also zoom is too limited in those cases. It's when someone posts a single line of text as a screenshot and it's too small for me to read. Can't zoom in enough to read it and struggle to zoom in on it at all.
hi, i actually super dislike this change a whole lot! sort of a bad problem to have, but i am dealing with a viral toot that is now eating up way too much real estate by having the 3 notification types separated, on top of the bug with duplicate notifications spamming me with an *insane* amount of notifications
i do not like having to disable certain types of notifications and think that is an improper solution, and would much prefer the old way back
@listeninggarden Unfortunately, that's a side effect of how Android notifications work.
There's a few different things at play here.
Apps create notification "channels". This allows users to set per-channel notification settings. For example, mute a channel, or set a channel to "vibrate only".
Tusky creates a different channel for each notification type -- boosts, mentions, favourites, etc, so you can decide how you want to be notified about these different things.
Critically, Android does not allow apps to find out what the notification channel settings are.
This is so bad apps can't see you've muted their notifications and refuse to enable some behaviour until you unmute them. The user remains in control, and apps can't see if they've been muted for spamming.
Within a channel notifications can also be turned in to a summary. Newer Android versions automatically do this, but still expect apps to create special "Summary" notification(s).
@listeninggarden Previously, Tusky only created one summary notification, and summarised all the received notifications in there.
This caused at least two problems and possibly three.
1. Suppose you had muted the "boosts" channel. Tusky can't tell that you've done that (per earlier), so the summary notification might contain information about posts that had been boosted, but the user doesn't want to see those.
@listeninggarden 2. There's one channel for each notification type, so if there's only one summary notification, which channel should it go in? Previously Tusky picked the channel of the most recent notification.
But what if the user has muted that notification channel? Again, Tusky can't tell, and now your summary notification (and possibly all the notifications it's summarising, the Android documentation is unclear on this point) are muted, and you can't see them.
@listeninggarden I think this is one of the reasons why we were getting reports that Tusky was losing notifications. They were still being sent, but the summary notification was going to a muted channel, so Android was hiding all of them.
3. The Android documentation doesn't cover what happens if a summary notification summarises notifications in different channels. That's a sufficiently weird edge-case that I'm not too surprised.
@listeninggarden Mastodon doesn't let you mute notifications about a single post, only entire classes of notification (all boosts, all favourites, etc), so Tusky doesn't do that either.
I'm not saying we couldn't -- it might make an interesting future feature, although the UX would take a bit of working out. I've jotted down some notes about that github.com/tuskyapp/Tusky/issu….
Allow the user to mute notifications on a post, so if they have a post that goes viral they can temporarily ignore notifications about just that post. Existing features to filter notifications or m...
@listeninggarden You mentioned "can take a while to group up". Yes, that's a problem too. If an Android app posts too many notifications at once Android will silently mute or completely drop those notifications. "Too many notifications at once" seems to be roughly more than one per second over a period of time.
@listeninggarden Tusky used to send Android notifications as fast as possible. That probably caused some notifications to be dropped or hidden by Android, and I think that's another reason why we were getting reports that Tusky was losing notifications. So v22 rate limits notification creation to one per second. As you've seen, if you suddenly get a lot of notifications they can take some time to post and be summarised.
@listeninggarden There's one other issue with v22 that will be changed in v23. An Android app can only have a maximum of 50 notifications. Post any more than that and they are dropped.
At the moment, when Tusky gets notifications it gets a block of the oldest ones that you haven't seen and posts those. But if you've got a lot of notifications (more than ~ 50), Tusky won't get all of them.
@listeninggarden So you get this behaviour where large blocks of notifications come in in chunks over time. This has led to user feedback that Tusky is slow to get notifications.
In v23 I'll change this -- each time Tusky gets new notifications it will get all of them, and delete the oldest ones until it's got no more than 50 to show. That behaviour will mean that some Mastodon notifications might not appear as Android notifications.
@listeninggarden But of the two possible behaviours I think trimming to just the newest ones is the most user friendly behaviour.
None of this affects what's on the Notifications tab -- that will always show all the notifications you have.
I hope that's helped explain why the current behaviour is the way it is. I appreciate that it's not the behaviour you want, but given the constraints imposed by Android and the Mastodon API it's what we have at the moment.
i greatly appreciate the very in-depth responses on how things got the way they are, and hate to see that there is a number of technical blockers on the os level that is causing problems
unfortunately, the change makes tusky completely invalid for my use, as i run with as much reduced clutter as possible for my own sanity. the prior method functioned perfectly, while this new one goes against my practices to minimalise noise without sacrificing access to information
Something weird is going on with notification marker fetching, resulting in users seeing duplicate notifications. I see this on some accounts, but not others. Symptoms on a working account (nikclay...
New Igalia Chats Episode: Steam Powered Open Source
@Meyerweb and @bkardell sit down to chat with fellow Igalians @samuelig and Clayton Craft about the Steam Deck and interesting work that Igalia does to power it.
![Cox–Zucker machine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Cox–Zucker machine is an algorithm created by David A. Cox and Steven Zucker. This algorithm determines whether a given set of sections provides a basis (up to torsion) for the Mordell–Weil group of an elliptic surface E → S, where S is isomorphic to the projective line.[1]
The algorithm was first published in the 1979 article "Intersection numbers of sections of elliptic surfaces" by Cox and Zucker[2] and was later named the "Cox–Zucker machine" by Charles Schwartz in 1984.[1]
Name origin
The name sounds similar to the obscenity "cocksucker". This was a deliberate choice by Cox and Zucker, who conceived of the idea of coauthoring a paper in 1970, while first-year graduate students at Princeton University, for the express purpose of enabling this joke. They followed through on it five years later, as members of the faculty at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.[3] As Cox explained in a memorial tribute to Zucker in Notices of the American Mathematical Society in 2021: "A few weeks after we met, we realized that we had to write a joint paper because the combination of our last names, in the usual alphabetical order, is remarkably obscene."[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cox%E2%80%93Zucker_machine](https://fedi.ml/photo/preview/640/436714 "Cox–Zucker machine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Cox–Zucker machine is an algorithm created by David A. Cox and Steven Zucker. This algorithm determines whether a given set of sections provides a basis (up to torsion) for the Mordell–Weil group of an elliptic surface E → S, where S is isomorphic to the projective line.[1]
The algorithm was first published in the 1979 article \"Intersection numbers of sections of elliptic surfaces\" by Cox and Zucker[2] and was later named the \"Cox–Zucker machine\" by Charles Schwartz in 1984.[1]
Name origin
The name sounds similar to the obscenity \"cocksucker\". This was a deliberate choice by Cox and Zucker, who conceived of the idea of coauthoring a paper in 1970, while first-year graduate students at Princeton University, for the express purpose of enabling this joke. They followed through on it five years later, as members of the faculty at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.[3] As Cox explained in a memorial tribute to Zucker in Notices of the American Mathematical Society in 2021: \"A few weeks after we met, we realized that we had to write a joint paper because the combination of our last names, in the usual alphabetical order, is remarkably obscene.\"[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cox%E2%80%93Zucker_machine")
Carl T. Bergstrom
in reply to Carl T. Bergstrom • • •The mind just boggles.
"Note that the tallying rule [private email, no international collaborators] identifies likely fakes, but it cannot determine with certainty whether a given publication is actually (legally) a fake. Nevertheless, it is a reliable tool to red-flag scientific reports for further analysis and is a rational basis to estimate the upper value of fake publishing in biomedicine."
RELIABLE TOOL?
RATIONAL BASIS?
How could anyone write this stuff and post it in good faith?
Carl T. Bergstrom
in reply to Carl T. Bergstrom • • •And then there's this:
"It is important to keep in mind that our indicators provide a red flag, not legal proof, that a given manuscript or publication might be fake. However, it is the authors' burden of proof to demonstrate that their science can be trusted."
BULLSHIT.
It is absolutely not the authors' burden of proof to demonstrate that their science can be trusted when the criteria used to question their work are (1) their email address and (2) the lack of international collaborators.
Carl T. Bergstrom
in reply to Carl T. Bergstrom • • •And then there's the survey they used to "validate" their hopeless instrument.
How would you respond if you received this from some random account?
As a misinformation researcher, I get all sorts of politically motivated harassment that looks a lot like this. Last thing I'm going to do is give them contacty information they could look up themselves for my university president, dean, HR people, etc.
To presume that not answering implies guilt is outrageous.
Carl T. Bergstrom
in reply to Carl T. Bergstrom • • •Finally, I want to stress that it is no defense whatsoever to say that the algorithm could be used simply as a preliminary screen to red-flag papers for additional scrutiny.
If one is going to propose machine-learning classifier to make instrumental decisions that affect careers and reputations, one must carefully and thoroughly consider issues of fairness and risks algorithmic harm that might arise.
The authors of this preprint don't even mention such issues.
Carl T. Bergstrom
in reply to Carl T. Bergstrom • • •Not only does the Science story fail to call them on this; its author falls into the one of the oldest and most pernicious traps around algorithmic bias.
The author contrasts the use of "automated methods" with reliance on "human prejudice", entirely overlooking the fact that the automated methods proposed here are nothing but the explicit and fully-descirbed instantiation of human prejudice.
It's truly an embarrassment all around.
Carl T. Bergstrom
in reply to Carl T. Bergstrom • • •UPDATE: The paper is on pubpeer, with a response from lead author Sabel.
I find it to be a completely unsatisfactory effort at misdirection, but decide for yourself.
The irony of this guy writing a preprint that spectacularly overestimates the frequency of fake papers using ridiculous methods, getting Science and NPR and a host of right-wing news organizations to pick it up, and then saying "The loss of trust in science is the key issue we should worry about."
pubpeer.com/publications/0CE23…
PubPeer - Fake Publications in Biomedical Science: Red-flagging Method...
pubpeer.com