Ok I debated making this but it cannot hurt. I hope all my fellow #Blind, #DeafBlind, and #VisuallyImpaired people, along with their family, friends, and others have had a great time at the #ACB and/or #NFB 2025 conventions. I am taking this time, and the increased activity on certain hashtags to do some shameless promotion of #OurBlind. OurBlind comprises the Discord, Lemmy, and Reddit communities operated by the staff of the r/Blind subreddit, as well as those who have joined since the creation of the Discord in 2022, and Lemmy in 2023. We have members from all over the world, and of all ages, hearing and vision levels, and are a safe space for Our LGBTQIA+ and neurodiverse friends. Our general community guidelines, and the links to reach our platforms can be found on our website.

Christoph Heiss
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •blami
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to blami • • •blami
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Fubaroque
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •If they can’t be bothered to put in a bit of punctuation and spacing themselves, then they clearly are very busy people with other priorities. So I certainly would not expect them to have checked the result for accuracy and readability… making the report a pain in the behind for the reader.
I’d redirect it to the bitbucket.
Threshold Kid 0mega
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Threshold Kid 0mega • • •curtmack
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •this is the clearest example I've seen of the idea that LLMs can write things that *sound* correct, but they fundamentally don't understand what "correct" even means.
This has the shape of a vulnerability report. The fact pattern has many hallmarks of vulnerabilities. But it doesn't really understand what a "vulnerability in curl" is, and the result is neither "a vulnerability" nor "in curl."
Hywel Mallett
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Is that the question you meant, or were you asking if AI was used ONLY to structure and format the report, and not to find the “vulnerability”?
For that, I don’t know. I wouldn’t have thought to test that, but then maybe I’m not imaginative enough!
daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Hywel Mallett • • •Richard Levitte
Unknown parent • • •@sycophantic Depends, I'd say. I've seen bug reports that were very hard to understand, even though English vocabulary was used, quite clearly a language barrier thing. I could see some use AI to better their document structure.
Mind you I'm not saying that is it in *this* case, but rather reacting on the notion that raw text is always better...
Richard Levitte
in reply to Richard Levitte • • •@sycophantic
That being said, if the result of going through AI is a relative word vomit, then I agree that nothing much is gained.
Information/wall of text fatigue is a thing.
daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Richard Levitte • • •Disinformation Purveyor
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Disinformation Purveyor • • •