Sensitive content
Unless we're doing some kind of livepatching, a 10 year uptime isn't something to be happy about.
Sincerely,
Ex-#infosec grump. 😄
But in all, beautifully-written article. I don't agree that trying to cater to the desktop is a bad thing, though, although the warnings they spoke of were valid.
That server had absolutely zero open ports to the internet and only acted as a transparent network traffic shaper with IPFW/ALTQ. It provided 10 years of service providing rock solid performance in this environment. I don't recall there being any CVEs that affected IPFW/ALTQ or any other TCP/IP functionality that it exposed.
I'm also an ex-infosec grump :)
Why is having a 10 year uptime on a FreeBSD network appliance so much different than a 10 year uptime on a Cisco switch/router? That is not uncommon either. If a CVE is only exploitable if you can somehow access the private management network I generally don't care so much because if they can access your management network you have much much bigger problems to deal with
> although the warnings they spoke of were valid.
I think they're a little confused because they seem to think that pkgbase means base comes from the ports tree and it's not stable anymore but rolling release instead. That's not what's even happening here.
Though they are correct at alluding to a more rapid development future being possible where we could have desktop users targeting STABLE or even CURRENT quite easily
Hi, around two weeks ago I started making Nexus, a Matrix client.
In these two weeks, I've made great progress, as you can see in the progress list.
However, I'd love some help implementing some features, or help with UI design, as it takes me quite a while to design a UI.
If you're interested, please reply!
Boosts appreciated! ❤️
reshared this
Official Audio for "Rom Coms" by Cassadee PopeListen to the new album Hereditary! https://orcd.co/hereditaryFollow Cassadee:http://cassadeepope.comhttp://in...YouTube
@dansup brings up an important point. I don't know of a lot of Fediverse developers who have received grants from the Canadian government. I built pumpio.org almost entirely with SR&D credits for StatusNet. That's the best example I can think of.
Given how many of us there are here, and how important the Fediverse is to our digital sovereignty, shouldn't there be more funding available?
mastodon.social/@dansup/115626…
The EU has supported me, @pixelfed and @loops@pixelfed.social more than my own country! I’m forever grateful to @nlnet@nlnet.Mastodon
By my count, Linux has over 11% of the desktop market. Here's how I got that number - and why people are making the leap.Steven Vaughan-Nichols (ZDNET)
Not that I usually put any warnings on my posts anywhere, or feel I have a reason to, and suspect filtering is far more useful for people who are triggered by certain topics, but I'm a little confused about how to correctly do Content Warning/Notices on Friendica?
The compose editor has a button that says "Content Warning" but it creates an [abstract] BBcode, which when used appears to make that content completely disappear on Friendica (though if you go to "Edit" it will still be there).
The [spoiler] BBcode appears to work like the Content Warnings do on Mastodon, plus you can add to it WHY you are hiding the content. But how do those look on other platforms?
Tobias makes a good point in that thread that how am I, as an author, supposed to guess what might "trigger" some random person reading what I wrote? The burden should be on the random person to set up filters so they reduce the likelihood they'll see anything they know might trigger them. Because I can't possibly know that! Which is why I pretty much never use CWs and if someone doesn't like it that's their problem.
I really don't want to join in on that thread, but after reading it I have to wonder why nobody mentioned the idea of using [spoiler] for a CW and leave [abstract] for a summary? Spoiler already collapses on Friendica just like CWs do on Mastodon. It would avoid having to add a network parameter to [abstract] to determine whether it appears as a summary or CW. It seems like an obvious solution to me. Just make spoilers = CW and be done with it?
@Random Penguin @Marcus
The abstract has a history. It was used to create a summary to send to other networks when they had a character limit. This makes sense when a post is 500 or 1000 characters long.
However, the summary can also be what its meaning implies. Friendica will provide both options with Michael's issues.
CW is extremely controversial. Even on Mastodon. The sender cannot know what might trigger someone. That is something the recipient must filter out.
Still, the intention of a spoiler and a CW are essentially the same, to hide content from someone that may upset them, and spoiler collapses on Friendica just like CWs collapse on Mastodon.
If abstract's intention is only as a summary then that should be all it does. Just because it has been used for CWs is no reason to keep using it for that if it doesn't make any sense, which IMO it doesn't.
@Random Penguin
The spoiler works differently
You should not continue reading if you do not want to know the ending of the film beforehand.
@Random Penguin
The fact that abstracts are now hidden was Friendica's response to the CW implementation in Mastodon. The spoiler was used instead.
Mastodon took the easy route. The projects responded.
You don't have to like it, and it will be fixed by the issues. But that's the story.
I may have missed something in that issues thread, but it sounded like Mastodon a summary tag converted from a bare [abstract] is now treated as a CW while [abstract=apub] is treated as an actual summary? That's still unnecessarily confusing when the [spoiler] code is right there and literally does exactly the same thing as a CW.
I rarely use CWs even on Mastodon and never use abstracts on Friendica. Anyway, I'm done arguing about it. I really don't care how my posts look on other platforms.
[abstract][/abstract] tags. The CW gets seen by others. [spoiler][/spoiler] seems to only work with networks that support more types of content formatting than Mastodon, basically. I.e. in Hubzilla it works, in Lemmy it should work (but it's buggy), in Piefed it should also work but I never checked.
Almost forgot about our #AndroidAppRain at apt.izzysoft.de/fdroid/?radd=1… – which brought you 25 updated and 1 added apps:
* Operator: a task manager that needs root powers 🛡️
RB Status: 756 apps (59.5%)
Enjoy your #free #Android #apps with the #IzzyOnDroid repo 
This is a repository of apps to be used with your F-Droid client. Applications in this repository are official binaries built by the original application developers, taken from their resp. repositories (mostly Github, GitLab, Codeberg).IzzyOnDroid App Repo
Anyone using a RasPi with a camera who can give apt.izzysoft.de/packages/ca.fr… a test view? It hasn't seen an update in 6 years – but if it works, and is found "worthy", we'd keep it…
play a raw H.264 stream from a Raspberry PiIzzyOnDroid Repo Browser
@mondstern It's not a question of time – it's a question of stewardship. It's not "out of boredom¹" – we've got a responsibility there.
¹ what was "boredom" again? Can't remember…
A vibed accessible, modern RSS client for the blind - serrebi/BlindRSSGitHub
reshared this
'I'll take things you can't say on the BBC for $200, Alex.' #BBC #corruption #ukpolBrian Gordon (Mastodon)
It feels like not much time has passed since I announced 1000 different pages on LPCwiki, but somehow we're up to over 2000!
Combined with the fact that certain LPCwiki pages have been cited in phone-related videos, it's nice to see what started as a small project to share more detailed system specs about feature phones grow as much as it has.
(yes, I do realize posts have been slow... but the number of phone-related PC software backups and firmware dumps has been moving steadily!)
Andre Louis
in reply to Charlotte Walker • • •Sensitive content
Charlotte Walker
in reply to Andre Louis • • •Sensitive content
Andre Louis
in reply to Charlotte Walker • • •Sensitive content
Charlotte Walker
in reply to Andre Louis • • •Sensitive content
Andre Louis
in reply to Charlotte Walker • • •Sensitive content
Charlotte Walker
in reply to Andre Louis • • •Sensitive content
Andre Louis
in reply to Charlotte Walker • • •Sensitive content
Charlotte Walker
in reply to Andre Louis • • •Sensitive content
Kara Goldfinch
in reply to Andre Louis • • •Sensitive content