RE: mastodon.social/@chris22smith/…
Definitely agree with @chris22smith here!
Just learned about public.monster from @dk that lets you make websites like it's the 90s again. (With a few quality-of-life improvements.)
Chris Smith (@chris22smith@mastodon.social)
I think that signing up for @piccalilli@front-end.social's emails has been one of the best things I've done this year. High quality, human curated content that interests me is underrated and hard to come by. https://piccalil.li/the-index/Chris Smith (Mastodon)


miki
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 • • •Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦
in reply to miki • • •miki
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 • • •Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦
in reply to miki • • •@miki that's bull.
Computers can count faster and with orders of magnitude fewer errors than we can.
Cars can move faster and longer distances, carrying heavier loads, than we can.
Anthropic and other AI hype companies are making bank on pretending their spicy autocomplete is so much better than human labor. We absolutely should point and laugh at them when these claims fall flat on their face.
miki
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 • • •Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦
in reply to miki • • •@miki the fact is LLMs are not better nor more useful than humans, research shows. We just keep falling for the hype.
> After completing the study, developers estimate that allowing AI reduced completion time by 20%. Surprisingly, we find that allowing AI actually increases completion time by 19%
arxiv.org/abs/2507.09089
> For an organization of 10,000 workers, given the estimated prevalence of workslop (41%), this yields over $9 million per year in lost productivity.
hbr.org/2025/09/ai-generated-w…
Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity
arXiv.org