"Mozilla is going to be more active in digital advertising."
"we do this fully acknowledging our expanded focus on online advertising won’t be embraced by everyone in our community" - blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/im…
I appreciate Mozilla laying their intent out explicitly with no room for interpretation or guesswork.
Personally, I think this is not just a huge misstep, but a deathknell.
Sarah Jamie Lewis
in reply to Sarah Jamie Lewis • • •I like Mozilla, or rather I liked what Mozilla once was. Over the years I've volunteered time on various Mozilla projects - both online and in-person. I've advocated for Firefox for two decades.....
Time after time, especially in recent years, I've given Mozilla the benefit of the doubt - because I both believed they were honestly doing things for the right reasons.
I no longer believe that.
Sarah Jamie Lewis
in reply to Sarah Jamie Lewis • • •Browser development and maintenance is a costly endeavor - any firefox fork has to either commit to that upkeep, or rely on being able to sift critical changes from unwanted cruft in a timely manner.
Ultimately I think the only way we can dig ourselves out of this mess is by making it easier to build and maintain browsers (There are perhaps alternative foundations to build on, such as servo on the horizon - but they too need funding.)
Sarah Jamie Lewis
in reply to Sarah Jamie Lewis • • •Short term....we have two cross-platform browser engines.
Both maintained by advertising companies - both with a multitude of forks claiming to disable and/or patch out the bad stuff.
But ultimately, both base browsers - and this the underlying web standards - are being primarily driven by the needs of advertisers.
AlgoCompSynth by znmeb 🇺🇦
in reply to Sarah Jamie Lewis • • •mcc
in reply to AlgoCompSynth by znmeb 🇺🇦 • • •AlgoCompSynth by znmeb 🇺🇦
in reply to mcc • • •Cy
in reply to AlgoCompSynth by znmeb 🇺🇦 • • •No, they didn't see an opening and took it. They swindled and deceived people, rigged the game so only they could win. Don't talk about Google like some dashing maverick, deftly dodging the sluggish giants. They're bullies, and cheats, and should be referred to as such.
Sorry but I'm sick of framing this abuse as if it were something to be admired and respected. Cutting edge? Really?
AlgoCompSynth by znmeb 🇺🇦
in reply to Cy • • •AlgoCompSynth by znmeb 🇺🇦
in reply to AlgoCompSynth by znmeb 🇺🇦 • • •@cy
Maybe the Google plan was always to dominate the market, but Chrome didn't catch fire because of that. It caught fire because it made browsing easier and web development tolerable. Every web developer I knew back then developed on Chrome and tested on the other browsers in later stages of the process. 2/2
Cy
in reply to AlgoCompSynth by znmeb 🇺🇦 • • •It didn't make anything easier though. Every webdev I knew showed little to no critical thinking, and just went where the hype is, so they started developing on Chrome because of the marketing saying it was the hip new thing. Nobody questioned it, or did any sort of critical study or comparison.
It's true IE was garbo.
Hubert Figuière
in reply to Cy • • •@cy @AlgoCompSynth
💯
History repeating. It happened with Internet Explorer before. But everyone seems to forget.
I have been calling Chrome the "New Internet Explorer" for a reason.