Would you like to be interviewed as part of the Rust Vision Doc data gathering process?
I am part of the team and would like to oversample people who wouldn't normally participate in such things
More info blog.rust-lang.org/2025/04/04/…
Help us create a vision for Rust's future | Rust Blog
Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.blog.rust-lang.org

)
Timnit Gebru (she/her).
in reply to Timnit Gebru (she/her). • • •There is no difference between the likes of Stanford and any of these companies, they're one and the same. So schools like it make money from the hype and will perpetuate the hype.
The McKinseys and other huge consulting orgs are raking in bank on the hype, akin to all the people who made money during the gold rush, except for the people looking for gold.
All the things people call "laws" aren't laws and were never "laws". Scaling laws? Some people looked at some plots and came up with that.
Timnit Gebru (she/her).
in reply to Timnit Gebru (she/her). • • •"Emergence"? Take a look at this paper showing how that is nothing but hot air: .
proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_f…
-"Reasoning"? Lets set aside how they don't even have a definition for this. But literally change some minor thing on the benchmarks like a number, and you see how these models completely fail. arxiv.org/pdf/2410.05229
-"Understanding"? Just watch this debate to see the rigor with which Emily discusses the topic vs those who make these wild claims: lnkd.in/e6bgM-43.
LinkedIn
lnkd.inTimnit Gebru (she/her).
in reply to Timnit Gebru (she/her). • • •If you come up with a new benchmark they'll just guzzle it as part of the training data and then claim to do "reasoning" on that.
It is so mind-boggling to me that people have to even spend time debunking these claims. Such a waste of resources that could be going to doing actual science and engineering work.
Timnit Gebru (she/her).
in reply to Timnit Gebru (she/her). • • •"Marcus is so confident current approaches cannot take us to the promised land of AGI that he bet Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei $100,000 that AGI would not be achieved by the end of 2027."
Lol but he signed the ridiculous "pause AI" letter with Muskrat and other billionaires and said that DAIR "went for blood" when we wrote this statement against it.
dair-institute.org/blog/letter…
Statement from the listed authors of Stochastic Parrots on the “AI pause” letter
www.dair-institute.org