If you use an AI-generated image for your article/post, this indicates to me you might have also used AI-generated text.
If you use AI-generated text for your article/post then:
1- I have no idea if you verified the veracity of any claimed facts.
2- I have no idea what your own voice is.
3- I have no idea if this truly expresses your own views, and if you even cared to read it.
4- I have no idea what your intention is with this, other than exploiting my attention and clicks with the least amount of efforts on your part.
5- This shows me you have no respect at all for the labour that was stolen to build these tools, exploiting millions of artists and writers to make billions of dollars without any compensation to them whatsoever.
Why would I want to engage with any content like that?
• I don't want to communicate with a machine (I can do that by myself).
• I don't want to participate in this disgusting exploitation of artists and writers.
• And I want to communicate with another human, of course.
If your intention isn't to communicate with another human, then stop deceiving them making them think they are 
reshared this
Mckensie parker
in reply to Sam Tupy • • •Jonathan
in reply to Sam Tupy • • •Jonathan
in reply to Jonathan • • •Alex Chapman
in reply to Jonathan • • •Jonathan
in reply to Sam Tupy • • •Hamid
in reply to Jonathan • • •Jonathan
in reply to Jonathan • • •Jonathan
in reply to Jonathan • • •Jonathan
in reply to Jonathan • • •Jonathan
in reply to Jonathan • • •Jonathan
in reply to Jonathan • • •Jonathan
in reply to Jonathan • • •Jonathan
in reply to Jonathan • • •Aryan
in reply to Jonathan • • •Marc Hoffmann
in reply to Jonathan • • •seddy
in reply to Sam Tupy • • •Rook
in reply to Sam Tupy • • •Kaliah
in reply to Sam Tupy • • •Kaliah
in reply to Sam Tupy • • •Ethin Probst
in reply to Sam Tupy • • •Aryan
in reply to Sam Tupy • • •Dane Stange
in reply to Sam Tupy • • •