From austinpolitics.net/the-state-oโฆ:
"I remember a couple years ago talking to a local businessman about Project Connect. 'If it doesn't go to the airport, what's the point?' he asked.
This is the kind of comment that would probably prompt vigorous nods of approval at a Chamber of Commerce luncheon but would make heads explode at a gathering of transit experts.
The idea that the purpose of public transit is to facilitate air travel is a more absurd version of the notion, popular among Sunbelt elites, that the point of public transit is to facilitate car travel by reducing car traffic.
(For the same reason that expanding highways doesn't reduce traffic, nor will public transit. The point of transit is not to make it easier to drive, it is to offer an alternative to driving.)"
Exactly.
The state of Project Connect
And should the train go to the airport?Jack Craver (The Austin Politics Newsletter)

Andrรฉ Polykanine
in reply to Chris Smart • • •Chris Smart
in reply to Andrรฉ Polykanine • • •Rich W. Beardsley
in reply to Chris Smart • • •Andrรฉ Polykanine
in reply to Rich W. Beardsley • • •