AI at its best: the review we requested from Google's "security" console (quotes intended as questioning the term) "failed". I'm pretty sure, with not a single human involved.
Works. </s>
So whenever Google's "safe" browsing warns you about something, make sure to check for yourself (if you can) – do not blindly trust them. Being Big does not imply being competent. Obviously.
But sure, put them into control of everything, what could go wrong…

FLOSSbOxIN
in reply to IzzyOnDroid ✅ • • •IzzyOnDroid ✅
in reply to IzzyOnDroid ✅ • • •The reason seems quite obvious here: the app in question is an APK Updater. Oh, does that match the current/upcoming changes in Goog's policy? I'm very surprised (not), this certainly is pure coincidence (not).
And no, we won't remove the app from our repo just because of Goog shenanigans and their "alternative realities". Count the number of malware found at F-Droid+IzzyOnDroid (0), compare that to findings at Play (∞), get to your conclusion (🖕).
(sorry, am fed up with this BS)
FLOSSbOxIN
in reply to IzzyOnDroid ✅ • • •I will speak more when we meet at FOSDEM. 😀
IzzyOnDroid ✅
in reply to FLOSSbOxIN • • •@fbinin What is most frustrating there is how that wastes our time. I don't have to give you the term "underhanded" here, your team shares that pain…
Updated my snippet again (gitlab.com/-/snippets/4909577). Recording those events for reference sounds like something more than due (hoping for "backfire" re:trust their "safe browsing"). Hopefully, someone collects such evidence (I know someone who is, he knows about my snippet) and brings it to the right places, in a big box…
Netcraft false positives, Google Safebrowsing shenanigans ($4909577) · Snippets · GitLab
GitLabFLOSSbOxIN
in reply to IzzyOnDroid ✅ • • •You may have seen how they are hiding behind the banking apps now and getting them to make sure people only use foogle store, and thereby bypassing the open market ruling.
I am going offtrack I guess. Frustrated tbvh.
IzzyOnDroid ✅
in reply to FLOSSbOxIN • • •@fbinin Hahaha… yes, I tried that back at DroidCon in 2024. Guess they'll only send the PR team, again…
Nevertheless: the two of us can have a coffee together of course! Our stands are even next to each other, so it can be a can of coffee instead of just a cup 😉
FLOSSbOxIN
in reply to IzzyOnDroid ✅ • • •Of course and I am very much looking forward to meeting you and others. I am wishing to even meet and make friends, rather than just acquaintance with at least a few there.
Only trouble for others would probably be like: I do not drink, nor smoke, and am pure vegetarian.
That may kill the mood for many. 🙃
C.Suthorn
in reply to IzzyOnDroid ✅ • • •IzzyOnDroid ✅
in reply to C.Suthorn • • •@Life_is I cannot speak for F-Droid here. But I can forward that question to our client teams (Droid-ify & Neo Store).
Though in this context, it might be much more subtle: why rejecting their inclusion at Play, when you already can shovel dirt on them before they even apply (by maliciously marking them malicious)? And it pretty much looks like the latter here: of course would they not accept any apps known for being malicious, right? So create the facts you need?