Search
Items tagged with: ChatGPT
Europäische Datenschützer reichen Beschwerde gegen OpenAI ein
Das KI-Programm ChatGPT veröffentlicht Daten über Privatpersonen, deren Herkunft unklar sei. Das werfen Datenschützer dem Anbieter OpenAI vor. Zudem ließen sich falsche Angaben nicht korrigieren.
#Datenschutz #DSGVO #ChatGPT #OpenAI #Noyb
How to (try to) block #IA scrapers with a tailored `robots.txt`:
You may want to use:
[Dark Visitor](https://darkvisitors.com/)
And:
[ai.robots.txt](https://github.com/ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt)
Adding to the list the `robots.txt` by #VLC:
[VLC robots.txt](https://www.videolan.org/robots.txt)
Source: **Bloquer les gaveurs d'IA** by @lord (in French)
https://lord.re/fast-posts/76-bloquer-les-gaveurs-dia/
Bloquer les gaveurs d'IA
Vous avez un joli site ouaib avec vorte ptit contenu écrit main. C'est votre blog, votre espace de réflexion, votre zone de création, votre espace rien qu'à vous partagé au monde, votre rejeton… C'est super chouette mais bon maintenant en 2024, ça ve…/home/lord
On Tech Talk this week, I had a great conversation with Troy Otilio from @AiraVI about their new Access AI feature, which has recently been released as a beta in the Aira Explorer app. We spoke about where this feature came from, the impact the use of AI has on privacy, and so much more about AI and Aira in general. Have a listen here or wherever you get your podcasts
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/rnib-tech-talk/id1151878596?i=1000652615215
@rnib #aira #AccessAI #AI #chatGPT #gemini #blind #accessibility #podcast
RNIB Tech Talk: Tech Talk 508: Access AI, WelcoMe In Currys, RNIB Gamer Survey on Apple Podcasts
Show RNIB Tech Talk, Ep Tech Talk 508: Access AI, WelcoMe In Currys, RNIB Gamer Survey - 16 Apr 2024Apple Podcasts
The racism behind chatGPT we are not talking about....
This year, I learned that students use chatGPT because they believe it helps them sound more respectable. And I learned that it absolutely does not work. A thread.
A few weeks ago, I was working on a paper with one of my RAs. I have permission from them to share this story. They had done the research and the draft. I was to come in and make minor edits, clarify the method, add some background literature, and we were to refine the discussion together.
The draft was incomprehensible. Whole paragraphs were vague, repetitive, and bewildering. It was like listening to a politician. I could not edit it. I had to rewrite nearly every section. We were on a tight deadline, and I was struggling to articulate what was wrong and how the student could fix it, so I sent them on to further sections while I cleaned up ... this.
As I edited, I had to keep my mind from wandering. I had written with this student before, and this was not normal. I usually did some light edits for phrasing, though sometimes with major restructuring.
I was worried about my student. They had been going through some complicated domestic issues. They were disabled. They'd had a prior head injury. They had done excellent on their prelims, which of course I couldn't edit for them. What was going on!?
We were co-writing the day before the deadline. I could tell they were struggling with how much I had to rewrite. I tried to be encouraging and remind them that this was their research project and they had done all of the interviews and analysis. And they were doing great.
In fact, the qualitative write-up they had done the night before was better, and I was back to just adjusting minor grammar and structure. I complimented their new work and noted it was different from the other parts of the draft that I had struggled to edit.
Quietly, they asked, "is it okay to use chatGPT to fix sentences to make you sound more white?"
"... is... is that what you did with the earlier draft?"
They had, a few sentences at a time, completely ruined their own work, and they couldnt tell, because they believed that the chatGPT output had to be better writing. Because it sounded smarter. It sounded fluent. It seemed fluent. But it was nonsense!
I nearly cried with relief. I told them I had been so worried. I was going to check in with them when we were done, because I could not figure out what was wrong. I showed them the clear differences between their raw drafting and their "corrected" draft.
I told them that I believed in them. They do great work. When I asked them why they felt they had to do that, they told me that another faculty member had told the class that they should use it to make their papers better, and that he and his RAs were doing it.
The student also told me that in therapy, their therapist had been misunderstanding them, blaming them, and denying that these misunderstandings were because of a language barrier.
They felt that they were so bad at communicating, because of their language, and their culture, and their head injury, that they would never be a good scholar. They thought they had to use chatGPT to make them sound like an American, or they would never get a job.
They also told me that when they used chatGPT to help them write emails, they got more responses, which helped them with research recruitment.
I've heard this from other students too. That faculty only respond to their emails when they use chatGPT. The great irony of my viral autistic email thread was always that had I actually used AI to write it, I would have sounded decidedly less robotic.
ChatGPT is probably pretty good at spitting out the meaningless pleasantries that people associate with respectability. But it's terrible at making coherent, complex, academic arguments!
Last semester, I gave my graduate students an assignment. They were to read some reports on labor exploitation and environmental impact of chatGPT and other language models. Then they were to write a reflection on why they have used chatGPT in the past, and how they might chose to use it in the future.
I told them I would not be policing their LLM use. But I wanted them to know things about it they were unlikely to know, and I warned them about the ways that using an LLM could cause them to submit inadequate work (incoherent methods and fake references, for example).
In their reflections, many international students reported that they used chatGPT to help them correct grammar, and to make their writing "more polished".
I was sad that so many students seemed to be relying on chatGPT to make them feel more confident in their writing, because I felt that the real problem was faculty attitudes toward multilingual scholars.
I have worked with a number of graduate international students who are told by other faculty that their writing is "bad", or are given bad grades for writing that is reflective of English as a second language, but still clearly demonstrates comprehension of the subject matter.
I believe that written communication is important. However, I also believe in focused feedback. As a professor of design, I am grading people's ability to demonstrate that they understand concepts and can apply them in design research and then communicate that process to me.
I do not require that communication to read like a first language student, when I am perfectly capable of understanding the intent. When I am confused about meaning, I suggest clarifying edits.
I can speak and write in one language with competence. How dare I punish international students for their bravery? Fixation on normative communication chronically suppresses their grades and their confidence. And, most importantly, it doesn't improve their language skills!
If I were teaching rhetoric and comp it might be different. But not THAT different. I'm a scholar of neurodivergent and Mad rhetorics. I can't in good conscience support Divergent rhetorics while supressing transnational rhetoric!
Anyway, if you want your students to stop using chatGPT then stop being racist and ableist when you grade.
#chatGPT #LLM #academic #graduateStudents #internationalStudents #ESL
#AI is used for more than just #ChatGPT 🤖
Algorithms analyze your behavior patterns & can monitor entire populations with little effort. 🔎
We need strong legislation to protect against expansion of the #surveillance state! 🚫🕵️♀️
Artificial Intelligence: The New Eyes Of Surveillance
While artificial intelligence systems continue to be hyped in 2024, the risks posed to data privacy can no longer be ignored.Matthias Pfau (Forbes)
OpenAI si vsimlo o jake niche je zajem v tisicich AI startupech a spustilo vlastni "GPT builder".
Je to celkem dobra evoluce v pouzitelnosti. Dost lidi si najde vlastni pouziti ChatGPT a to se pro ne stane synonymem pro AI. Napriklad doplnovani kodu, analyza tabulek, zkracovani textu, copy na socky... Pojmenovane chaty s jakoby ruznou funkci jim tuhle kotvu pomuzou zvednout.
Tech vsech AI startupu mi vubec neni lito.
*obrazek vygenerovan random z Cosmic Dream GPT modulu.
OK, trying an experiment with my Programming Languages class!
• Have an AI generate some of your writing assignment.
• Critique its output. Call BS on its BS.
Assignment details in screenshots below. I’ll let you know how it goes.
(Here are the links from the screenshots:)
Raw AI Text:
https://gist.github.com/pcantrell/7b68ce7c5b2e329543e2dadd6853be21
Comments on AI Text:
https://gist.github.com/pcantrell/d51bc2d4257027a6b4c64c9010d42c32
(Better) Human Text
https://gist.github.com/pcantrell/f363734336e6063f61e451e2658b50a6
#ai #chatgpt #education #writing #highered
#swift #proglang
My favorite outcome so far: a student remarked (paraphrasing here) that she didn’t realize how much she had to say in her paper until she saw how wrong the AI was, how much it missed the point.
Observing her own reaction to BS about her topic made her realize she’d underestimated the extent of her own newly-forming knowledge. That…that is the sort of outcome an educator dreams of.
1. Telling #AI model to “take a deep breath” causes math scores to soar in study!
2. #OpenAI DALL-E pays more attention to words in all caps.
3. Don't forget to say thank you and please to #LLM because Simon Willison thinks "in the training data, there are lots of examples where a polite conversation was more constructive and useful than an impolite conversation."
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/10/thanks-to-ai-the-future-of-programming-may-involve-yelling-in-all-caps/
Thanks to AI, the future of programming may involve YELLING IN ALL CAPS
Politeness and emphasis play a surprising role in AI-model communications.Ars Technica
ONLYOFFICE 7.4 Adds Draw Tools and Plugin Support for ChatGPT
Some neat improvements feature in the latest update to ONLYOFFICE, an open-source productivity suite for Windows, macOS, and Linux. As always I’m not shouting the name to annoy you, it’...Joey Sneddon (OMG! Ubuntu!)
"Don’t Tell #ChatGPT Anything You Wouldn’t Want to See on a #Billboard"
"Here’s a simple tip: DO NOT use #AI on any work-related project without checking your company’s policy. Even if your company has no policy, think twice, or even three times, before you put anything work-related into an AI.
You don’t want to become infamous for triggering the privacy fiasco that spurs your company into creating such a policy."
https://uk.pcmag.com/ai/146847/dont-tell-chatgpt-anything-you-wouldnt-want-to-see-on-a-billboard
Don’t Tell ChatGPT Anything You Wouldn’t Want to See on a Billboard
Chatting with an AI program feels personal and conversational, but don’t be fooled. Here's why you should keep a lid on what you reveal to ChatGPT and its ilk.Neil J. Rubenking (PCMag UK)
https://www.pcmag.com/news/dont-tell-chatgpt-anything-you-wouldnt-want-on-a-billboard
Don’t Tell ChatGPT Anything You Wouldn’t Want to See on a Billboard
Chatting with an AI program feels personal and conversational, but don’t be fooled. Here's why you should keep a lid on what you reveal to ChatGPT and its ilk.Neil J. Rubenking (PCMag)
Are AI tools really as smart as creative writers? 🧐 It looks like we will soon know for sure. In any case, AI and its influence on our societies must be watched closely: After all the tools were trained with human writers content who they are now supposed to replace.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkap3m/gpt-4-cant-replace-striking-tv-writers-but-studios-are-going-to-try
Read more on this issue and why ChatGPT is a privacy nightmare: 👉 https://tutanota.com/blog/posts/chatgpt-privacy
#ai #creative #content #writers #privacy #chatgpt #bard #ernie
GPT-4 Can’t Replace Striking TV Writers, But Studios Are Going to Try
The desire to replace writers with AI is a symptom of the larger problem that the guild is fighting for—which is that companies do not value writers and their work.Chloe Xiang (VICE)
ChatGPT Faces Ban in Italy Over Privacy Concerns
The action by Italy’s data protection agency is the first known instance of the chatbot being blocked by a Western country.Adam Satariano (The New York Times)
You can help creating the dataset on https://open-assistant.io!
The first dataset release is planned for 15. April 2023.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64Izfm24FKA
OpenAssistant - ChatGPT's Open Alternative (We need your help!)
#openassistant #chatgpt #ai Help us collect data for OpenAssistant, the largest and most open alternative to ChatGPT.https://open-assistant.ioOUTLINE:0:00 - ...YouTube
https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/23/openai_ceo_leak
Read also our blog post on ChatGPT: A #privacy nightmare or a helpful tool? https://tutanota.com/blog/posts/chatgpt-privacy
OpenAI CEO 'feels awful' after ChatGPT leaks conversations, payment info
Delayed mea culpa isn't a good look for a biz with 'open' in the nameJessica Lyons Hardcastle (The Register)
Nevermind, I know why: This is #OpenAI yet again trying to sell their text synthesis machine as "an AI".
#MathyMath #AIHype
Beyond that, though, #GenerativeAI is removing barriers for him to code and contribute. He even released his first #OpenSource project recently sharing his experience!
https://github.com/readme/featured/open-source-accessibility
#ChatGPT #GitHubCopilot #GitHub #A11y
From gaming with your eyes to coding with AI: New frontiers for accessibility
Open source offers developers with disabilities the flexibility needed to participate and collaborate. Their contributions and involvement in the research, design, and development of software are i...Mike Melanson (GitHub)
Content warning: Politics, Brave Browser, AI, ChatGPT, LGBTQ+ rights, COVID denialism
The end of front-end development · Things are going to change, but not in the scary way people are saying https://ilo.im/11t8v2
_____
#Job #AI #GPT4 #ChatGPT #ChatBot #WebDevelopment #WebDev #Code #Frontend #HTML #CSS #JavaScript #Skills #Productivity
The End of Front-End Development
Large language models like GPT-4 are becoming increasingly capable, at an alarming rate. Within a couple of years, we won't need developers any more! …Or at least, that's the narrative going viral on Twitter.ilo.im
Repeat this infinitely in a closed loop of techbro busywork until you get bored or die.
Leave the rest of us to create and appreciate the art form in a modest human way.
#chatgpt #ai #techbros #publishing #ebook #writing #writingCommunity #amWriting #reading #amReading
https://tutanota.com/blog/posts/chatgpt-privacy
#ai #privacy #chatgpt
ChatGPT on privacy: Could you write this better?
An essay on privacy written by ChatGPT. Find out who is the better writer: You or the AI.Tutanota